June 2003
Dear [Medical Director]
My Name in Kathleen E. Dauer and I have a private practice in St. Paul that provides speech and language services to many of your members. I am writing this to you to further discuss why XXX needs to consider changing their policy on exclusion of stuttering to a covered service as soon as possible.
First, for several years, The Minnesota Speech Language Hearing Association has asked you to change your policy on the exclusion of stuttering as a covered service. Thus far, you have not done so. I am uncertain if you are aware that all the other HMO's [in Minnesota???] cover this disorder. That is one reason you need to change your policy.
Second, within the last several months, my clinic has been submitting services for stuttering clients to get the denial in writing so my clients could discuss an appeal. Thus far, I have never received a denial. Recently, when I called XXX claims department, they said it was an error that had slipped through the system. An error that had slipped through the system, not on one client but on several, not on one date of services but on many. If it were not for my moral and ethical values, (by calling XXX and pointing out the error), it would never have been caught and you would have paid for stuttering anyway.
Third, rarely do we see a child with just a stuttering disorder. Often times, the disorder is associated with or a result of other disorders such as word finding, articulation and other language disorders which are all covered services under XXX' s policy. Sometimes, a child when first evaluated may just have an articulation or phonological disorder and then as we begin treatment and push their motor system, they begin to stutter which is also a motor problem. At that point in therapy, I would try to establish a fluent foundation for the child and then continue with the articulation therapy. When treating a child with these mixed disorders, it would be unethical for me to not deal with the stuttering along with the other disorders. Because you reimburse speech and language pathologist by the session only and because it is unethical for me to not treat that as part of the problem, the disorder of stuttering is again probably being covered for short periods of time anyway.
Fourth, stuttering is no different in nature than any other disorder you cover. The scientists studying this disorder are finding more and more evidence that it is medical, specifically neurological and genetic in nature.
Fifth, stuttering is a very treatable disorder especially in the young child and the school aged child. If these children are treated by a specialist of fluency disorders like myself, they will be remediated and will not need any further services. If left untreated, it will affect them vocationally, socially and emotionally. Many of our adult clients need psychological services as well as speech services because of all the emotional trauma that they have suffered because of their stuttering. I would assume the psychological treatment would be a covered service, but actually unnecessary if they would have been treated by a specialist earlier in their life for their stuttering disorder.
Because I specialize in the disorder of stuttering, people come from all over the state to receive services. They pay my clinic privately for the services. So your change in policy would not affect my clinic financially. However, it would help your members. For all the reasons listed above, please consider changing this disorder to a covered service for the benefit of all your members.
Sincerely,
Kathleen E. Dauer, M.S., CCC
CC: Attorney General
Minnesota Department of Health